Close







logotop.gif
 
Home
blank.gif
Free DVD
blank.gif
Q & A
blank.gif
Leap of Faith
blank.gif
Studies
blank.gif
Articles
blank.gif
Testimonials
blank.gif
Warranty
blank.gif
Delivery-Specs
blank.gif
Order Machine
blank.gif
Related Topics

BBB OnLine

Romfab
Factory Showroom
Opening hours:
Weekdays 9am-5pm
and sometimes by
special arrangement
on Saturday and
during after-hours.

8140 Webb Ave.
North Hollywood,
California 91605 USA
Sales@FastExercise.com
Phone:  (818) 787-6460
Fax: (818) 301-0319

AMAZON-E9B6E807

em yt tw fb
Another ignorant blog we found
   

The blog dates are in reverse order from the most recent blog entries at the top to the older ones below. THe original blog can be found here: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=37506

Text of blog is below:


clarabelle
New Blood
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 15
My Profile ROM - The 4-Minute CrossTrainer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.fastexercise.com/

This machine costs $14,000 and is meant to be used 4 to 8 minutes per day.

The Website features research that shows the machine is more effective at increasing aerobic capacity than 30 minutes per day on a treadmill.

To me, this seems amazing enough to qualify for the million dollar challenge.

Anyone here familiar with this scam?
 
         

clarabelle
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to clarabelle
Find More Posts by clarabelle

 8th April 2005, 07:29 PM    #2 
Floyt
Chordate
 
 
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dunedin
Posts: 282
My Profile
 Well, they DO present a lot of information on oxygen uptake, muscle groups etc, which looks generally acceptable to not-really-up-to-date-in-physiology me. There might be faulty extrapolations in there, I shouldn't wonder - just ramping up along an "oxygen uptake by exercise time" graph feels a deal to linear for biological processes.
The rant about "What do experts know?" on the front page is a bit of an alarming sign, too.
__________________
Science is about finding out which untruths can be asserted so as to make the system tractable, while still achieving an adequate account of what will appear. 
         

Floyt
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to Floyt
Visit Floyt's homepage!
Find More Posts by Floyt

 8th April 2005, 08:42 PM    #3 
clarabelle
New Blood
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 15
My Profile Quote:
Originally posted by Floyt
Well, they DO present a lot of information on oxygen uptake, muscle groups etc, which looks generally acceptable to not-really-up-to-date-in-physiology me.
Their website states "The same 180 pound person will burn 465 calories as a result of 4 minutes on the ROM machine." My understanding is that a person running a 4 minute mile burns only slighter more kcals than someone walking the same distance - about 100 kcals. Could their machine actually cause a person to burn more energy than a miler making a maximum effort?
 
         

clarabelle
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to clarabelle
Find More Posts by clarabelle

 8th April 2005, 11:02 PM    #4 
Terry
Zeitgeist-impaired
Technical Moderator
 
 
 

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: logged in to the server
Posts: 3,771
My Profile
 Quote:
Originally posted by clarabelle
Their website states "The same 180 pound person will burn 465 calories as a result of 4 minutes on the ROM machine."
465Kcal in 4 minutes is 8 kilowatts. Based on known power outputs of elite cyclists (Lance Armstrong can sustain 600w for around an hour, track sprinters can do well over a kilowatt for around one minute), I seriously doubt that the average joe is going to be able to do this. In fact I'd be amazed if this were possible for even the elite of explosive power athletes.

--Terry.
 
         

Terry
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to Terry
Find More Posts by Terry

 8th April 2005, 11:36 PM    #5 
Terry
Zeitgeist-impaired
Technical Moderator
 
 
 

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: logged in to the server
Posts: 3,771
My Profile
 Quote:
Originally posted by Terry
465Kcal in 4 minutes is 8 kilowatts. Based on known power outputs of elite cyclists (Lance Armstrong can sustain 600w for around an hour, track sprinters can do well over a kilowatt for around one minute), I seriously doubt that the average joe is going to be able to do this.
Crud, I forgot to figure in metabolic efficiency. You'd be doing about 1.3 Kw of mechanical output to burn 8 Kw. That's still a heck of a lot, but within the bounds of possibility for an elite athlete.

--Terry.
 
         

Terry
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to Terry
Find More Posts by Terry

 9th April 2005, 12:27 AM    #6 
El Greco
Summer worshipper
 
 
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On a Greek island beach
Posts: 7,804
My Profile It's the new fashion of presenting some valid studies and then extrapolating to pure BS. So, they cite some valid studies about the better effectiveness of High Intensity Interval Training as opposed to traditional low intensity aerobic work as far as aerobic capacity and general fitness is concerned, and then they go on with this completely unjustified conclusion:


Quote:
During the 4 minutes on the ROM you use 55% of your muscles and you use them through an average of 80% of their range of motion (ROM stands for Range of Motion). The total percentage of muscle cells involved in the ROM exercise are 12 times as many as the 3.75% used on a treadmill because 80% of 55% of your muscles is 44% of all your muscle cells that are stimulated to an increased metabolism. During the 4 minute ROM workout the 180 pound person burns only 40 calories. But those 44% of the body's muscle cells that have been stimulated to increased metabolism will burn another 150 calories in the 2 hours after the 4 minute ROM exercise and they will burn another 275 calories in the remaining time of a 24 hour period.
This is ridiculous. Not only the percentages of muscle usage are completely arbitrary, but the estimation of post-exercise energy consumption is outrageous. If I had here the guy who wrote this I'd punch him really hard. Sometimes I think that I could live a very happy life just by destroying such crooks.

For a realistic view of what to expect as far as EPOC is concerned see this.

I wanted to read more of what that mofo has been writing, but unfortunately my blood pressure has skyrocketed since I read the above.
__________________
Later I watched you in Marseilles / disappearing in the din, not turning back,
and I who loved only the sea's expanse / now say I could have loved you too.
"A bord de 'L'Aspasia" - Nikos Kavadias

Let it go and come to bed already, El Greco. - MoeFaux
 
         

El Greco
View Public Profile
Quote this post in a PM to El Greco
Find More Posts by El Greco

 9th April 2005, 10:40 AM    #7 
Dr. Imago
Graduate Poster
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,207
My Profile This seems like it would be fairly easy to test this device. This could be accomplished by doing physiologic testing directed specifically on this machine. None of the studies quoted on the page specifically tested the machine itself, but reference HIIT in other settings (although the way they referenced the studies on their website dubiously suggests and infers that they did).

I wouldn't worry too much, in the meantime, about this catching on. The pricetag is prohibitively expensive and the only people likely to get suckered into buying one are people who have nothing better to do with their money anyway.